UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14 (A) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
ý
Filed by a partyParty other than the Registrant [ ]
o
Check the appropriate box:
[ ]
oPreliminary proxy statement
[X] Definitive proxy statement
[ ] Definitive additional materials
[ ] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-11(c) or Rule 14a-12
[ ]Proxy Statement
o Confidential, forFor Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a 6(e)Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[ ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(I)(4) and 0-11:
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies;
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies;
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11. (Set forth the amount on which
the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined.);
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction;
(5) Total fee paid.
[ ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number or the
Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount previously paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement Number:
(3) Filing party:
(4) Date filed.
| o | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| o | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| o | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
14455
14505 N. HAYDEN RD.,ROAD, SUITE 202
305
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85260
85260-6951
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MARCH 25, 2003
APRIL 26, 2006
To the Shareholders of National Scientific Corporation:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of National Scientific Corporation, a Texas corporation (NSC), will be held on Tuesday,
March 25, 2003,Wednesday, April 26, 2006, at the ChaparralWingate Inn & Suites, Hotel, 500114255 North Scottsdale Rd.,87th Street, Scottsdale, Arizona, 8525085260 at 8:10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect three directors to the Board of Directors to serve for a
one-year term.
2. To ratify the appointment of Hurley & Company to serve as the auditors
for the Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2003.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
| 1. | To elect three directors to the Board of Directors to serve for a one-year term. |
| 2. | To recommend the appointment of Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC to serve as the auditors for the Company for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006. |
| 3. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 19, 2003March 8, 2006 (the "Record Date"“Record Date”), are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Shares may be voted at the Annual Meeting only if the holder is present or represented by proxy. A list of shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection at the Company'sCompany’s corporate headquarters for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting during ordinary business hours for ten (10) days prior to the Annual Meeting.
A copy of NSC'sNSC��s Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes audited financial statements, is included with this mailing, which is being first mailed on or about February 24, 2003.March 22, 2006. Management and the Board of Directors cordially invite you to attend the Annual Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Graham L. Clark
Graham L. Clark, Secretary
Phoenix, Arizona
January 27, 2002
| | | By Order of the Board of Directors /s/ Graham L. Clark Graham L. Clark, Secretary |
Scottsdale, Arizona March 10, 2006 | | | |
SHAREHOLDERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY. A PRE-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE IS PROVIDED FOR THEIR CONVENIENCE. SHAREHOLDERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO VOTE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER OR NOT THEY ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS. NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
14455
14505 NORTH HAYDEN ROAD, SUITE 202
305
SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85260-6947
85260-6951
PROXY STATEMENT
2003
2006 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MARCH 25, 2003
APRIL 26, 2006
This Proxy Statement is furnished by the Board of Directors of National Scientific Corporation, a Texas corporation (the "Company"“Company” or "NSC"“NSC”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be used for the purposes of voting at the 20032005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting"“Annual Meeting”) of the Company. The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday March 25, 2003,Wednesday, April 26, 2006, at 8:10:00 a.m., local time, at the ChaparralWingate Inn & Suites, Hotel, 500114255 North Scottsdale Road,87th Street, Scottsdale, Arizona, 85250.
85260.
SOLICITATION AND VOTING OF PROXIES
The enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company. The proxy materials related to the Annual Meeting are to be mailed on or about February 24, 2003,March 22, 2006, to shareholders of record at the close of business on February 19, 2003March 8, 2006 (the "Record Date"“Record Date”). Only shareholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, either in person or by valid proxy. As of the Record Date, there are approximately 64,076,00095,795,459 outstanding shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Common Stock"“Common Stock”) of the Company.
Shareholders are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock held of record on each matter of business to be considered at the Annual Meeting. Ballots cast at the Annual Meeting will be counted by the Inspector of Elections and determinations of whether a quorum exists and whether the proposals are approved will be announced at the Annual Meeting. The three nominees receiving a plurality of votes by shares represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, if a quorum is present, will be elected as a directordirectors of the Company.
All valid proxies received before the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be exercised. All shares represented by proxy will be voted, and where a shareholder specifies by means of his, her or its proxy a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon, the shares will be voted in accordance with the specifications so made. If no specification is indicated and authority to vote is not specifically withheld, the shares will be voted (i) "for"“for” the election of the persons named in the proxy to serve as Directors; and (ii) "for"“for” the ratificationrecommendation of HurleyEpstein Weber & CompanyConover, PLC as the independent auditors of the Company. The Inspector of Elections will treat abstentions and broker non-votes received as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum, but as unvoted for purposes of determining the approval of any matter. If a broker indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain shares to vote on a particular matter, those shares will not be considered as present and entitled to vote with respect to that matter.
The Company will bear the cost of the solicitation of proxies, including the charges and expenses of brokerage firms and others for forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the outstanding Common Stock. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited by personal interview or telephone. A person giving the enclosed proxy has the power to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by: (i) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person; (ii) duly executing and delivering a proxy bearing a later date; or (iii) sending a written notice of revocation to the Secretary of the Company at its corporate offices. The corporate offices of the Company are located at 1445514505 North Hayden Road, Suite 202,305, Scottsdale, Arizona 8526085260-6951 and its telephone number is (480) 948-8324.
The information included herein should be reviewed in conjunction with the financial statements, notes to financial statements, independent accountants'accountants’ report and other information included in the Company's 2002Company’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders that waswill be mailed with this Proxy Statement to all shareholders of record on the Record Date. The Board of Directors knows of no other matters that may be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, persons named in the enclosed proxy or their substitutes will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board of Directors of NSC (the "Board"“Board”) has recommended the election of three directors. The Board recommends that the shareholders elect the nominees named below as directors of NSC for the ensuing year and until their successors are elected and qualified. The persons named in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote for the election of the three nominees listed below. Mr. RossGrollman is currently the Chairman-Emeritus of the Board, Mr. GrollmanChief Executive Officer and is serving as Chairman of the Board and Acting Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Clark is President of National Scientific and is currently serving as Secretary and a director, and Mr. Szabo is currently serving as an outside director. Each nominee has indicated a willingness to serve, but in the event any one or more of such nominees for any reason should not be available as a candidate for director, votes cast will be cast pursuant to authority granted by the enclosed proxy for such other candidate or candidates as may be determined by the holders of such proxy. The Board knows of no reason to anticipate that any of the nominees will not be a candidate at the Meeting.
Name Current Position With Nsc Age
---- ------------------------- ---
Lou L. Ross Director and Chairman-Emeritus
of the Board 73
Name | | Current Position With NSC | | Age |
| | | | |
| Michael A. Grollman | | Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Board | | 44 |
| Graham L. Clark | | President, Director, Secretary | | 50 |
| Gregory Szabo | | Director (Outside) | | 52 |
Michael A. Grollman Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board 41
Graham L. Clark Vice President, Director,
Secretary 48
LOU L. ROSS serves today as a director and as Chairman-Emeritus of the
Company's Board. He has been a director since 1996 and assumed President and CEO
duties in March 1998. Mr. Ross resigned as CEO of NSC in January of 2002, and
also resigned as an employee of NSC in January of 2002, and became a contract
consultant for NSC. He resigned as Chairman of the Board in December 2002. From
1970 to 1975, Mr. Ross served as Chairman and CEO of Intel Malaysia, established
Intel's Manila plant and started Intel's military products operation. From 1976
to 1996, Mr. Ross served in a management capacity for various electronics
manufacturing firms, including Labelab and Advanced Semiconductor Engineering
(ASE), where he was a Founder, as well as General Manager and Executive Vice
President.
MICHAEL A. GROLLMAN.Grollman. Michael Grollman first became Chief OperatingOperation Officer in October 2000. Mr. Grollman was appointednamed President in April 2001, Chief Executive Officer in January of 2002, and Chairman of the Board in December 2002.2002, and Acting Chief Financial Officer in June of 2003. From 1998 to September 2000, Mr. Grollman served as Regional Service Director of MicroAge, Inc., a company that provides customer-configured technology solutions to businesses. He served as General Manager, Executive Vice President, and Chief Technology Officer for Advanced Information Systems from 1987 to 1998. Mr. Grollman received his Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry from the State University of New York, andYork. He received his MBA from Arizona State University.
GRAHAM
Graham L. CLARK. Clark. Graham Clark joined the CompanyNational Scientific in December 2000early 2001 as leadergeneral manager of the sales organization. He became Vice President of Technology Applications & Sales for National Scientific in September 2001, andthe spring of 2002, a director
and formally an officer of the corporationDirector in August of 2002. He2002, and became NSC'sCorporate Secretary in January of 2003. BeforeMr. Clark was named President of National Scientific in September of 2003. For the two years immediately before joining National Scientific, Mr. Clark was the General Manager of the Billet Precision Engineering Group, a privately held start-up manufacturing company providing custom engineering and manufacturing solutions to the semiconductor industry and other related industries. Prior to his tenure with Billet, he worked as Corporate General Manager for Amtech Systems, Inc. a publicly traded semiconductor equipment manufacturer. Six years prior, he was a founder and senior partner of GC Technology, a private representative organization for semiconductor capital equipment. Mr. Clark has a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from Paisley University in Scotland.
Gregory Szabo. Gregory Szabo joined National Scientific’s board on October 1, 2003 as an outside Director. Mr. Szabo serves on the Board's Audit and Compensation Committees. Mr. Szabo served in various executive positions at Exten Corporation, including President of Exten Corporation and CEO of MultiCell Technologies, Inc. from approximately May 2000 to April 2004, where was responsible for public reporting, fund-raising for the corporation and overall accountability for its subsidiaries, including revenue generation, intellectual property protection and organizational development. Mr. Szabo was also a director at Exten, a publicly traded company. Immediately before joining Exten, Mr. Szabo was for a number of years President & CEO of Titan Scan Corporation, a division of Titan Corporation, with subsidiaries in sterilization, defense, software, and communications. Mr. Szabo has held several executive positions with Sunrise Medical Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of numerous institutional and retail products. Mr. Szabo earned a BA in Psychology from the University of Toledo and a MA in Management from the Drucker Graduate School at Claremont University.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR“FOR” EACH NOMINEE FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The
(PROPOSAL 1)
Committees and Meetings of the Board of Directors
Our business
of NSC is managed under the direction of the
Board.Board of Directors. The Board meets on a regularly scheduled basis to review significant developments affecting
NSCus and to act on matters requiring Board approval. It also holds special meetings when an important matter requires Board action between scheduled meetings. The Board met
eight (8)four (4) times during fiscal
2002 and did not
act by consent in lieu of any meetings.2005. Each serving director attended
in excess
of 75%100% of the meetings held in
20022005 by the Board and the committees of the Board on which such director served.
2
In MayThe Board of 2002,Directors was made up of three members during fiscal 2005. Michael A. Grollman has been a director since November of 2000. Graham L. Clark has been a director since August of 2002. Former director Mr. Charles E. Martin resignedLou Ross retired from the Board. He stated
his decision to resign was his concern regarding receivingboard on September 30, 2003 for personal reasons, citing no conflicts with management or board policy. Mr. Szabo joined the board on October 1, 2003. Currently, our Board fees. In July
of 2002, Mr. Sam CarrDirectors consists of three members, Michael A. Grollman, Chairman, Graham L. Clark, Secretary, and Mr. Bill Keilen resigned from the Board. Both stated
their reason for resigning from theGregory Szabo. These Board was attributable to NSC's decision to
discontinue its D&O insurance policy, which the Company discontinued as an
expense reduction measure.
members were re-elected by shareholder vote in April 2005.
As of September 30, 2002,2005, the Company had one committee, the Audit
Committee. This committee met once in fiscal 2002, and consisted at the start of
fiscal 2002 of Charles E. Martin and Michael A. Grollman. Mr. Grollman continues
as the sole member oftwo committees, the Audit Committee and NSCthe Compensation Committee. Mr. Greg Szabo is recruiting additionalchairman of our audit committee as an outside director and financial expert, is currently its sole member. The audit committee has reviewed our financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, as audited by Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, National Scientific's independent directors at this timeauditors. Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC has discussed these financial statements with appropriate financial expertise to servemanagement and the audit committee.
Mr. Grollman and Gregory Szabo served on the Board and its AuditCompensation Committee.
Prior to August
All new directors appointed after the end of fiscal year 2002 Directors(employee or non-employee) will be provided with a one-time grant of NSC who are not employees20,000 shares of NSC were
compensated at a rate of $2,000 cash per month and $100 per Board meeting, with
the Chairman Mr. Ross receiving an additional $500 per month Chairman's fee. In
August 2002 and forward, the Company determined it would pay non-Employee
Directors $2000 per month in NSC restricted Common Stock and make no cash
paymentsupon original appointment to the Board. This stock will be subject to forfeiture back to the Company should the Director for any reason not serve a full term on the Board members. Mr. Ross's Agreementat least up to the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Current employee-directors are not paid cash or stock for $2500board service, but are expected to provide board service as a part of their standard compensation from the Company.
Non-employee directors will also be paid $1,250 per monthBoard meeting, which includes telephone board meetings as well as face-to-face board meetings. This $1,250 fee will be in the form of $250 cash and $1,000 of NSC restricted Companycommon stock. The restricted Common Stock payablewill be at risk of forfeiture back to the Company if the director does not serve his complete term out to the next annual shareholders’ meeting. This fee will not be paid for telephone conversations involving board members or others where no formal board meeting has been declared, or for normal committee meetings. Stock grants made for specific dollar amounts will be computed using the prior average closing price of the Company’s common stock during the prior quarter.
Non-employee directors will also be paid retrospectively a quarterly continues through February
2003.
retainer of 10,000 options (as defined in the 2000 NSC Stock Option Plan) to purchase free trading NSC common stock at the end of each fiscal quarter they have served. The options will be immediately vested at point of grant, and will be issued at a strike price equal to the average closing price for the Company’s common stock for that quarter.
Non-employee directors who serve on a board committee, such as the audit, nominating, or compensation committees, will also be paid retrospectively a quarterly additional retainer of 10,000 options (as defined in the 2000 NSC Stock Option Plan) to purchase free trading common stock at the end of each fiscal quarter they have served. The options will be immediately vested at point of grant, and will be issued at a strike price equal to the average closing price for the Company’s common stock for that quarter. Non-employee directors who serve on multiple committees will be paid this bonus only once for general committee service, however, as it is not paid for each committee of service. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The table below sets forth certain information, as of
the Record Date,March 10, 2006, concerning the beneficial ownership by (i)
each director and nominee of the
Company,all current directors, (ii) each of
the Company'sour named executive officers, (iii) each person known to
the Companyus to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of
NSC'sour outstanding
Common Shares,common stock, and (iv) all
of our directors and executive officers
of the Company as a group. To
theour knowledge,
of the Company, all persons listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares, except to the extent that
authority is shared by their respective spouses
share authority under applicable law.
Number of
Common Shares
Name and Address of Beneficially Percent of
Beneficial Owner (1) Owned (2) Outstanding Shares
- ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------
Lou L. Ross 3,576,310 (3) 6%
Michael A. Grollman 2,566,000 (4) 4%
Graham L. Clark 1,326,667 (5) 2%
Sam H. Carr 1,400,000 (6) 2%
All executive officers
and directors as a group
(4 persons) 7,489,173 14%
- --------------
(1) The business address for all directors and officers of the Company is c/o
the Company, 14455 North Hayden Road, Suite 202, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260.
(2) A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be
acquired within 60 days from the date set forth above through the exercise
of any option, warrant or right. Shares of Common Stock subject to options,
warrants or rights that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60
days are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person
holding such options, warrants or rights, but are not deemed outstanding
for computing the percentage of any other person. The amounts and
percentages are based upon the approximately 64,045,000 shares of Common
Stock outstanding as of January 23, 2003.
(3) Includes 1,000,000 shares held by Mr. Ross' wife, and 750,000 shares
underlying currently exercisable stock options held by Mr. Ross.
(4) Includes 1,050,000 shares underlying currently exercisable stock options
and warrants, and 1,250,000 shares of restricted Common Stock subject to
substantial risk of forfeiture.
(5) Includes 326,667 shares underlying currently exercisable stock options and
warrants and 1,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock subject to
substantial risk of forfeiture.
(6) Includes 1,150,000 shares underlying currently exercisable stock options
and warrants. Mr. Carr resigned as an officer and director in July 2002.
3
| | | Number of | | | |
| | | | Common Shares | | | Percent of |
| | | | Beneficially | | | Outstanding |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) | | | Owned (2) | | | Shares |
| | | | | | | | |
| Michael A. Grollman | | | 5,750,000 | (3) | | | 6.0% |
| Graham L. Clark | | | 2,201,667 | (4) | | | 2.3% |
| Gregory Szabo | | | 157,240 | (5) | | | 0.2% |
| | | | | | | |
| All executive officers and directors as a group (3 persons) | | | 7,608,907 | | | | 8.5% |
_______________
(1) | The business address for all directors and officers is c/o National Scientific Corporation, 14505 North Hayden Road, Suite 305, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260-6951. |
(2) | A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired within 60 days from the date set forth above through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right. Shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants, or rights that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such options, warrants, or rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. The amounts and percentages are based upon the approximately 95,795,459 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 10, 2006. |
(3) | Includes 1,050,000 shares underlying currently exercisable stock options and warrants, and 4,700,000 shares of restricted Common Stock including 2,000,000 shares subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. |
(4) | Includes 326,667 shares underlying currently exercisable stock options and warrants and 1,750,000 shares of restricted Common Stock including 1,500,000 shares subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. |
(5) | Includes 80,000 shares underlying currently exercisable stock options and warrants and 77,240 shares of restricted Common Stock subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. |
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires the Company'sour directors and executive officers, as well as persons beneficially owning more than 10% of the Company'sour outstanding Common Stock, to file certain reports of ownership with the Commission within specified time periods. Such officers, directors, and shareholders are also required by Commission'sCommission’s rules to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on itsour review of such forms, all requirements received by it, or written representations from certain reporting persons, the Company
believeswe believe that between October 1, 20012002 and September 30, 2002,2005, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and 10% shareholders were met.
CODE OF ETHICS
Our board adopted on July 28, 2004, a code of ethical conduct that applies to our principal executive officers and principal financial officer. Its purpose is to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships, full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that a small business issuer files with, or submits to, the Commission and in other public communications made by the small business issuer, compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations; the prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and accountability for adherence to the code. A copy of this code has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. An additional copy can be found on our website at www.national-scientific.com or by writing to the Company and requesting one.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information regarding annual and long-term compensation for services rendered to the Companyus during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, 20012005, 2004, and 20002003 to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,National Scientific, and other named executive officers who served NSCus in fiscal year 20022005 and whose total salary and non-cash compensation exceeded $100,000 for the applicable fiscal periods. The table below table includes salary earned and paid in the fiscal year endingended September 30, 2002,2005, and also salary earned in that yetyear but as yet unpaid as of January 24, 2003.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
31, 2006.
Summary Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | Long-Term Compensation | | | |
| | | | | Annual Compensation | | Awards | | Payouts | | | |
Name and Principal | | Fiscal | | Salary | | Bonus | | All Other Compensation | | Restricted Stock Award(s) | | Securities Underlying Options/ | | LTIP Payout | | All Other Compensation | |
Position | | Year | | ($)(1) | | ($) | | ($) | | ($)(2) | | SARs (#) | | ($) | | ($)(3) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Michael A. Grollman | | | 2005 | | | 69,200 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 110,800 | |
CEO, Chairman (4) | | | 2004 | | | 94,200 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 70,800 | |
| | | 2003 | | | 64,640 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 70,360 | |
| Graham L. Clark | | | 2005 | | | 87,000 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 63,000 | |
President, Director (5) | | | 2004 | | | 101,100 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 41,400 | |
| | | 2003 | | | 69,639 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 50,360 | |
| Lou L. Ross | | | 2005 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
| Former CEO & | | | 2004 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Chairman (retired) (6) | | | 2003 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 17,650 | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
| Sam H. Carr | | | 2005 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
Former CFO (7) | | | 2004 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
| | | 2003 | | | – | | | – | | | 32,362 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | |
| Gregory Szabo | | | 2005 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 1,000 | |
Director (8) | | | 2004 | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | – | | | 2,250 | |
_______________
Annual Compensation
------------------------------------
Other Annual
Fiscal Salary Bonus Compensation
Name and Principal Position Year ($)(1) ($) ($) | Unpaid wages in this table are subject to Agreements with listed persons that allow for interest of approximately prime rate plus 2% accruing on those unpaid wages until paid. These accruals for interest are shown as approximate through fiscal year-end September 2005. |
(2)
- --------------------------- ------ -------- --------- ------------
Lou L. Ross, Chairman-Emeritus | Stock grants included in this column are for common stock valued at 90% of the Board closing sales price for such shares on the date of grant. Closing sales price at fiscal year end September 2005 was approximately $0.045 per share, and closing sales price at fiscal year end September 2004 was approximately $0.075 per share. |
(3) | Includes unpaid salary forgone at the election of executive officers Grollman and Clark pursuant to a registrant program under which stock, stock-based or other forms of non-cash compensation may be received by a named executive in lieu of a portion of annual compensation earned in a covered fiscal year. |
(4) | Salaries of $110,800, $70,800, and $70,360 were not paid in cash, but deferred to a future period for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively. In December 2003 Mr. Grollman agreed to convert approximately $150,000 of his back pay and accrued vacation pay to our restricted common stock, at a rate equal to the then currently available private placement share price of $0.10 per share. Mr. Grollman received this stock in January of 2004. On August 17, 2005, Mr. Grollman agreed to convert approximately $34,500 of his back pay to our restricted common stock at the rate of the average market price per share of $0.046. On August 31, 2005, Mr. Grollman agreed to convert approximately $15,190 of his back pay to our restricted common stock at the rate of the average market price per share of $0.035. Also subsequent to fiscal 2005 year-end, Mr. Grollman deferred all of his October, November and January monthly salary of $15,000 and $14,900 of his December salary of $15,000 to a future period. During fiscal 2005 and up to January 2006, Mr. Grollman’s share of contributions to the Company’s health insurance program of $12,740 were deducted from the balance of wages owing, leaving as of the end of January 2006, unpaid wages of $153,817 accrued vacation pay of $31,966 and accrued interest on deferred salary of approximately $21,851 for a combined total of approximately $207,634. |
(5) | Salaries of $63,000, $41,400, and $50,360 were not paid in cash, but deferred to a future period for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003 respectively. On August 17, 2005, Mr. Clark agreed to convert approximately $23,000 of his back pay to our restricted common stock at the rate of the average market price per share of $0.046. On August 31, 2005, Mr. Clark agreed to convert approximately $9,500 of his back pay to our restricted common stock at the rate of the average market price per share of $0.035. Also subsequent to September 30, 2005 year-end, Mr. Clark deferred $7,350 of his November monthly salary, $4,500 of his December monthly salary and all of his January monthly salary of $12,500 to a future period. During fiscal 2005 and up to January 2006, Mr. Clark’s share of contributions to the Company’s health insurance program of $14,863 were deducted from the balance of wages owing, leaving as of the end of January 2006, unpaid wages of $122,943, accrued vacation pay of $32,359 and accrued interest on deferred salary of $20,885 for a combined total of approximately $176,187. |
(6) | Other Compensation for 2003 includes common stock grants paid as board service fees. Mr. Ross resigned as an employee in January of 2002 98,700 -- 4,500
2001 120,465 -- --
2000 110,591 -- --
Michael A. Grollman, President, CEO, Chairman (4)and as a director in September 2003. |
(7) | Other Compensation for 2003 includes $32,362 of contractor fees for services rendered in the six months to March 2003, of which approximately $31,137 remains unpaid. Mr. Carr resigned in July 2002 181,500 -- 78,750
2001 172,500 -- 165,000
2000 -- -- --
Sam H. Carr (5) 2002 160,275 -- 34,166
2001 158,075 -- 138,000
2000 -- -- --
Graham L Clark, Vice-President, Director (6) 2002 120,000 -- 63,000
2001 120,000 -- --
2000 -- -- --
as an employee and a director. (See Employment Agreements below). |
(8) | Other Compensation for 2005 and 2004 of $1,000 and $2,250 is for board fees. |
- --------------
(1) Unpaid wages in this table are subject to Agreements with listed persons
that allow for interest of approximately prime rate plus 2% to accrue on
those unpaid wages until paid. These interest amount accruals are shown as
approximate through year end September 2002.
(2) Stock Grants included in this column are for restricted Common Stock shares
valued at 90% of the closing sales price for such shares on the date of
grant. Closing sales price at fiscal year end September 2002 was
approximately $.07 per share.
(3) Salary for 2002 includes $12,000 that was not paid out in cash, but
deferred to a future period, and remains unpaid, plus an estimated $700 of
interest through September 2002 year end on this unpaid amount. Other
Compensation for 2002 includes restricted Common Stock grants of $2500 per
month August and September paid as Board fees. Mr. Ross resigned as an
employee in January of 2002. (See Employment Agreements below).
4
(4) Salary for 2002 includes $42,500 that was not paid in cash, but deferred to
a future period, along with $1,500 estimated interest on this unpaid
amount. Subsequent to year of September 2002,
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
We engaged Mr. Grollman
exchanged
$10,000 of this deferred salary for a B Unit in the Company's November 2002
Private Placement Offering for 125,000 shares of restricted stock and
100,000 Common Stock purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $.50 per
share, thus reducing 2002 unpaid wages for that year to $32,500. Other
Compensation for 2002 also includes $78,750 for restricted Common Stock
grants subject to risk of forfeiture if calendar 2003 sales do not meet or
exceed key targets, and in exchange for salary reduction in calendar year
2003 of $60,000. Also subsequent to fiscal 2002 year end, Mr. Grollman
deferred substantially all his October and November salary of $15,000 each
month and $8,000 of his December 2002 and January 2003 salary to a future
period, and this amount of $46,000 remains unpaid, leaving a total unpaid
wages as of the end of January 2003 of approximately $78,500, plus accrued
interest. Other Compensation for 2001 includes 100,000 shares of restricted
Common Stock granted to Mr. Grollman in connection with his employment
agreement. (See Employment Agreements below).
(5) Salary for 2002 includes $30,173 that was not paid out in cash, but
deferred to a future period, and remains unpaid, including all accrued
vacation through July 2002, plus an estimated $1,500 in interest through
September 30, 2002. Other Compensation for 2002 includes $34,166 of
contractor fees for services rendered in August and September of 2002, of
which $21,337 remains unpaid. Subsequent to year ending September 2002,
$10,000 of other deferred contractor fees was exchanged by Mr. Carr for an
A Unit in the Company's November 2002 Private Placement Offering for
250,000 shares of restricted stock and 100,000 Common Stock purchase
warrants exercisable at a price of $.30 per share. Other Compensation in
2001 for Mr. Carr includes the value of options granted at an exercise
price below the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Mr. Carr
resigned in July 2002 as an employee and a director. (See Employment
Agreements below).
(6) Salary for 2002 includes $10,000 that was not paid in cash, but deferred to
a future period. Subsequent to year end September 2002, Mr. Clark exchanged
$10,000 of deferred salary for a B Unit in the Company's November 2002
Private Placement Offering for 125,000 shares of restricted stock and
100,000 Common Stock purchase warrants exercisable at a price of $.50 per
share. Other Compensation for 2002 also includes $63,000 for Restricted
Common Stock grants subject to risk of forfeiture if 2003 sales do not meet
or exceed key targets. Also subsequent to September 30, 2002 year end, Mr.
Clark deferred substantially all his October and November salary of $10,000
each month and $3,000 of his December and January salary to a future
period, and this amount of $26,000 remains unpaid (See Employment
Agreements below).
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Throughout fiscal 2000, Mr. Ross was engaged as an independent contractor
for the Company. As such, Mr. Ross was paid a monthly fee of $9,500, subject to
cash availability. Effective December 1, 2001, Mr. Ross became an employee of
the Company. Throughout fiscal 2001 and continuing into the current fiscal year,
Mr. Ross served without a written contract and was paid $9,500 monthly. In
addition, in connection with an equity transaction involving Mr. Ross and his
spouse in September 1999, the Board granted Mr. Ross the right to receive 4% of
the gross revenues of NSC. In partial consideration for the forgiveness of this
right to 4% of NSC's future revenues, the Company agreed to issue 500,000
restricted shares of Common Stock in NSC to Mr. Ross. The 500,000 shares are
subject to the terms of a Restricted Stock Award Agreement, which requires that
the shares issued will be released only when the market price of the stock
exceeds $2.50 per share.
Subsequent to fiscal year end 2001, the Company granted Mr. Ross options
to purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of Common Stock. These options
consist of ten separate tranches of 75,000 shares each, whose exercise prices
range from $1 to $10 per share, which vest when the previous five day average
market price exceeds even dollar levels beginning with $1 per share through $10
per share.
In February of 2002 Mr. Ross resigned as an employee of NSC, and became a
part-time contractor for the Company, paid at a rate of $10,000 per month, of
which 20% would be deferred until a future date. The term of the agreement was
two years and it required that Mr. Ross provide management consulting services
to the Company of approximately 80 hours per month, and to serve as a director.
In July 2002 NSC and Mr. Ross amended the contract to eliminate mandatory
monthly minimum cash payments and minimum hours per month for on-going
consulting duties outside of his role as a director. Mr. Ross's contract
currently provides for a director's fee of $2,500 per month payable in NSC
restricted Common Stock, which the Company has issued through January 2003. This
Director's Fee Agreement is scheduled to be reviewed after February 2003.
5
Mr. Grollman was engaged by NSC as an independent contractor from October 7, 2000 until November 30, 2000. He was paid $15,000 monthly for his services as an independent contractor. Effective December 1, 2000, Mr. Grollman became an employee of NSCNational Scientific under a one yearone-year contract to serve as NSC'sour Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Grollman was promoted tonamed President in April 2001. The contract automatically renews for additional one-year terms unless either party chooses to terminate.terminate, and it remains in force through at least calendar year 2005. Mr. Grollman'sGrollman’s contract calledcalls for an annual gross salary of $180,000, payable semi-monthly. Also in accordance with the contract, on December 1, 2000, NSCwe granted Mr. Grollman 100,000 shares of restricted Common
Stock.common stock, subject to risk of forfeiture should Mr. Grollman not fulfill the terms of this employment agreement. Also on December 1, 2000, NSCwe granted Mr. Grollman 500,000 vested options to purchase Common Stockcommon stock at the closing sales price of the Common Stockcommon stock on December 1, 2000. Additional option grants are included in Mr. Grollman'sGrollman’s employment contract for each whole dollar amount increase in the market value of NSC'sour Common Stock. The whole dollar amount increase is measured over a moving two-week average. For each whole dollar amount attained between $1 and $15 inclusive, Mr. Grollman will receive 75,000 options at the whole dollar amount option price. Mr. Grollman is also entitled to additional options at various but declining levels for increases in stock value up to $50 per Common Share. In the event of a change in control or sale of substantially all the assets of NSC,National Scientific, the employment agreement between Mr. Grollman and NSCus automatically terminates, and Mr. Grollman is to receive one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the then current year'syear’s annual salary.
In January of 2002 Mr. Grollman agreed to defer 20% of his salary until such a time as cash was more available, reducing his immediately payable cash salary to $12,000 per month. For September, October, and November of 2002, Mr. Grollman deferred 100% of his payable salary, reducing his immediately payable cash salary to $0 per month. ForMr. Grollman agreed from January 2003 through December of 2002 and January of2003 to reduce his total payable salary for the 2003 year to $120,000 per year. In addition to this reduction, during the year ended September 30, 2003 Mr. Grollman deferred $8,000 per month$70,360 of his salary and was paid $7,000$64,640 in cash. During the year ended September 30, 2004 Mr. Grollman deferred $70,800 of his salary and was paid $94,200 in cash. For calendar year 2004, Mr. Grollman agreed to defer up to $30,000 of his contracted pay as needed. During the year ended September 30, 2005 Mr. Grollman deferred $110,800 of his salary and was paid $69,200 in cash. . Also subsequent to fiscal 2005 year-end, Mr. Grollman deferred all of his October, November and January monthly salary of $15,000 and $14,900 of his December salary of $15,000 to a future period. During fiscal 2005 and up to January 2006, Mr. Grollman’s share of contributions to the Company’s health insurance program of $12,740 were deducted from the balance of wages owing, leaving as of the end of January 2006, unpaid wages of $153,817 accrued vacation pay of $31,966 and accrued interest on deferred salary of approximately $21,851 for a combined total of approximately $207,634.
In September 2002, the Company's Boardour board initiated a restricted stock retainage program ("(“Stock Retainage Program"Program”) to retain key staff during a period of financial difficulty in calendar year 2002. The Companyboard allocated approximately $150,000 in restricted Common Stockcommon stock from this Stock Retainage Program pool of shares, to be granted to key employees during the year, subject to the CompanyNational Scientific exceeding sales growth objectives and expense reduction objectives in 2003. Failure to meet these objectives under the plan would result in the forfeiture by staff of this entire stock grant by all participants. These goals were not met in calendar year 2003. In January of 2004, our Board extended this program into 2004, and set new sales growth objectives for the year at a level 50% higher than the previous year’s program, giving plan participants an additional year to fully earn this stock grant. On August 19, 2003, a participant of the plan left us and his grant of 800,000 shares were forfeited at the average market price per share of $0.15. On September 30, 2003 the 800,000 shares of common stock resulting from the forfeiture was allocated to the plan. We issued this stock under the terms of the plan to several employees in 2004 who are not officers or directors of National Scientific. As of the date of this report none of these grants have been fully earned, and they remain subject to substantial risk of forfeiture.
Mr. Grollman was granted 750,000 shares of stock from this Stock Retainage Program pool of shares, subject to the CompanyNational Scientific achieving in excess of $200,000$400,000 in sales in calendar year 2003, and subject to him accepting a $60,000
per year pay reduction for the calendar year 2003, reducing his annual payable
salary to $120,000 per year for 2003.2004. Mr. Grollman was granted an additional 500,000 shares of stock under this program, subject to sales exceeding $1,000,000$1,500,000 for calendar year 2003. 2004.
In additionDecember 2003 Mr. Grollman agreed to convert approximately $150,000 of his back pay and accrued vacation pay to our restricted common stock, at a rate equal to the then currently available private placement share price of $0.10 per share. Mr. Grollman received this stock in January of 2004.
On August 31, 2005, Mr. Grollman agreed to convert approximately $15,190 of his back pay to our restricted common stock, the rate of the average market price per share of $0.035. Mr. Grollman received this stock in September of 2005.
Mr. Clark was hired in December 2000 as manager of the sales organization. His salary was $120,000 per year base salary, plus commission on sales. He became Vice President of Technology Applications & Sales for us in September 2001, and a director and a corporate officer in August of 2002. In January of 2003, Mr. Clark entered into a one-year employment agreement with National Scientific to serve as Vice President of Technology Applications & Sales. In June of 2003 Mr. Clark was named President of National Scientific. The contract automatically renews for additional one-year terms unless either party chooses to terminate. Mr. Clark’s contract provides for an annual gross salary of $150,000, payable monthly. In the event of a change in control or sale of substantially all our assets, the employment agreement between Mr. Clark and National Scientific automatically terminates, and Mr. Clark is to receive fifty percent (50%) of the then current year’s annual salary.
For September, October, and November of 2002, Mr. Clark deferred 100% of his payable salary, reducing his on-goingimmediately payable cash salary by 30%,to $0 per month. During the year ended September 30, 2003 Mr. Grollman hasClark deferred $50,360 of his salary and was paid $69,640 in cash. During the year ended September 30, 2004 Mr. Clark deferred $41,400 of his salary and was paid $101,100 in cash. During the year ended September 30, 2005 Mr. Clark deferred $63,000 of his salary and was paid $87,000 in cash. Also subsequent to September 30, 2005 year-end, Mr. Clark deferred $7,350 of his November monthly salary, $4,500 of his December monthly salary and all of his January monthly salary of $12,500 to a future period. During fiscal 2005 and up to January 2006, Mr. Clark’s share of contributions to the Company’s health insurance program of $14,863 were deducted from the balance of wages owing, leaving as of the end of January 2006, unpaid wages of $122,943, accrued vacation pay of $32,359 and accrued interest on deferred salary of $20,885 for a combined total of approximately $176,187.
Mr. Clark was granted 500,000 shares of stock from our Stock Retainage Program pool of shares discussed above, subject to National Scientific achieving in excess of $400,000 in sales in calendar year 2004. Mr. Clark was granted an additional 500,000 shares of stock under this program, subject to sales exceeding $1,500,000 for calendar year 2004.
On August 31, 2005, Mr. Clark agreed to temporarily defer an additional 30%convert approximately $9,500 of his remaining salary,back pay to our restricted common stock, the rate of the average market price per share of $0.035. Mr. Clark received this stock in September of 2005.
Throughout fiscal 2000, Mr. Ross was engaged as an independent contractor for National Scientific. As such, Mr. Ross was paid a monthly fee of $9,500, subject to cash availability, reducingavailability. Effective December 1, 2001, Mr. Ross became an employee of National Scientific. Throughout fiscal 2001 and continuing into 2003, Mr. Ross served without a written contract and was paid $9,500 monthly. In addition, in connection with an equity transaction involving Mr. Ross and his monthly cash salary
paymentspouse in JanuarySeptember 1999, the Board of 2003Directors granted Mr. Ross the right to $7,000 per month. This deferral is subjectreceive 4% of our gross revenues. In partial consideration for the forgiveness of this right to change on a month-by-month basis, at4% of our future revenues, National Scientific agreed to issue 500,000 restricted shares of our common stock to Mr. Grollman's election andRoss. The 500,000 shares are subject to the availabilityterms of cash.
a Restricted Stock Award Agreement, which required that the shares issued be released only when the market price of the stock exceeds $2.50 per share.
Subsequent to fiscal year end 2001, National Scientific granted Mr. Ross options to purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of common stock. The options consist of ten separate groups of 75,000 shares each, whose exercise prices range from $1 to $10 per share, which vest when the previous five day average market price exceeds even dollar levels beginning with $1 per share through $10 per share. On September 30, 2003, these options were forfeited and returned to us.
In February of 2002, Mr. Ross resigned as an employee of National Scientific, and became a part-time contractor, paid at a rate of $10,000 per month, of which 20% would be deferred until a future date. The term of the agreement was two years and it required that Mr. Ross provide approximately 80 hours per month management-consulting services to us and serve as a director. In July 2002 National Scientific and Mr. Ross amended the contract to eliminate mandatory monthly minimum cash payments and minimum hours per month for on-going consulting duties other than his responsibilities as a director. Under this revised contract, Mr. Ross was paid a director’s fee of $2,500 per month in our restricted common stock. In February 2003 this contract was again revised, and from February 2003 to September 30, 2003 Mr. Ross agreed to take a reduction in his director’s fees and accept 50,000 shares of common stock in lieu of cash for board services for the entire six-month period. Mr. Ross retired from the board on September 30, 2003. His major contract duties as a consultant with us ended in February 2004, although some confidentiality provisions of this agreement continue into 2005.
Mr. Carr served NSCus as an independent contractor from October 15, 2000 until November 30, 2000. He was paid $13,750 monthly for his services. Effective December 1, 2000, Mr. Carr became employed under a one year contract to serve as NSC'sour Chief Financial Officer. The contract automatically renewed for additional one-year terms unless either party choseelected to terminate. Mr. Carr'sCarr’s contract provided for an annual gross salary of $180,000, payable semi-monthly. Also in accordance with the contract, on December 1, 2000, NSCwe granted Mr. Carr 100,000 vested options to purchase Common Stockcommon stock at a price equal to 25% of the closing price per share on December 1, 2000. Also on December 1, 2000, NSCwe granted Mr. Carr 500,000 vested options to purchase Common Stockcommon stock at the closing sales price of the shares on December 1, 2000. Additional option grants were included in Mr. Carr'sCarr’s employment contract for each whole dollar amount increase in the market value of NSC'sour Common Shares. The whole dollar amount increase is measured over a moving two-week average. For each whole dollar amount attained between $1 and $15 inclusive, Mr. Carr willwould receive 75,000 options at the whole dollar amount option price. Mr. Carr iswas also entitled to additional options at various but declining levels for increases in stock value up to $50 per Common Share.
common share.
From January of 2002 through July of 2002, Mr. Carr deferred 20% of his salary, subject to future cash availability, reducing his monthly salary cash payments to $12,000 per month.
In July of 2002, Mr. Carr resigned as CFO and also as an employee and a
company director,
of NSC, and became a full-time non-employee contractor for
the Company.us. He signed a
one yearone-year contract, the terms of which were similar to his previous
6
company employment contract with the Company,contracts, although all employee-related benefits were eliminated, and his hourly rate of pay was changed to approximately $97 per hour, or approximately $17,000 per month. The contract provides for automatic
renewals for additional one-year terms unless either party chooses to terminate.
Mr. Carr's contract provided his oversight of important financial activities
within the Company. In November 2002, the CompanyNational Scientific and Mr. Carr amended this contract to eliminate his on-going oversight duties, and to eliminate mandatory monthly payments. The amended contract calls for Mr. Carr to be paid at a rate
of approximately $97 per hour for services rendered to the Company on an
as-needed basis, although this rate may be subject to increase if the total
hours required by the Company is significantly less than full time. Mr. Carr was retained on this basis during the month of December 2002 to assist with preparation of the Company'sour annual 10-KSB report and other matters, for which he was paid approximately $12,000 in cash. In January 2003 Mr. Carr and the
CompanyNational Scientific agreed to secure his services as a financial consultant for a minimum retainer of ten hours per month at a rate of $120 per hour. This retainer agreement is scheduled to be reviewedended on April 1, 2003.
Mr. Clark was hired
In January 2003, we, under our Restricted Stock Retainage Plan initiated in December 2000 as managerSeptember 2002, issued 2,550,000 shares of common stock at an average price of $0.06 or 90% of the sales
organization. He was hired as an at-will employee at a rateprice on the grant date of $120,000 per year
base salary, plus commission on sales. He became Vice President of Technology
Applications & Sales forSeptember 30, 2002. These grants were provided originally to Michael Grollman, Graham Clark, David Mandala, and Karen Fuhre. Mr. Mandala left the firm in mid-2003, and his shares under the plan were reallocated to Oscar Quadros and Paul Davidson. These stock grants were contingent upon National Scientific in September 2001, and a director
and formally an officer of the corporation in August of 2002. In January of
2003, Mr. Clark entered into a one-year employment contract with the Company to
serve as Vice President of Technology Applications & Sales. The contract
automatically renews for additional one-year terms unless either party chooses
to terminate. Mr. Clark's contract provides for an annual gross salary of
$120,000, payable monthly. In the event of a change in control or sale of
substantially all the assets of NSC, the employment agreement between Mr. Clark
and NSC automatically terminates, and Mr. Clark is to receive fifty percent
(50%) of the then current year's annual salary.
For September, October, and November of 2002, Mr. Clark deferred 100% of
his payable salary, reducing his immediately payable cash salary to $0 per
month. For December of 2002 and January of 2003, Mr. Clark deferred $3,000 per
month of salary, and was paid $7,000 in cash each month.
Mr. Clark was granted 500,000 shares of stock from the Company's Stock
Retainage Program pool of shares discussed above, subject to the Company
achieving in excess of $200,000 in sales in calendar year 2003. Mr. Clark was
granted an additional 500,000 shares of stock under this program, subject to
sales exceeding $1,000,000targets for calendar year 2003. In addition, Mr. Clark has
also agreedShould these targets not be met, these shares would be forfeited, or we and the employees involved in the program would elect to temporarily deferestablish new goals for calendar year 2004, in order to motivate the staff to perform and simultaneously conserve cash resources during the next calendar year, using the same stock grants, as yet unearned, as long term incentive.
During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, we issued 160,084 shares, of our common stock to our consultants in lieu of cash compensation. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005 we generally did not use the services of consultants, therefore, we did not issue shares of our common stock to our consultants in lieu of cash compensation to them. During fiscal 2004, we granted 790,000 options to our consultants and employees to purchase shares of our common stock. The options granted had exercise prices ranging from $0.09 per share to $0.16 per share. The exercise prices were generally below market on the date of grant, and vested. We granted these options as a means of compensation to consultants to conserve operating cash. During fiscal 2005, no options were granted to consultants or employees. The only options granted were issued to an additional 30% of his remaining salary
subject to cash availability, reducing his monthly cash salary payment in
January of 2003 to $7,000 per month. This deferral is subject to change on a
month-by-month basis, at Mr. Clark's election.
outside director for board fees.
REPORT OF AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Audit Committee") is responsible for, among other things, reviewing and discussing the audited financial statements with management, discussing with the Company's auditors information relating to the auditors' judgments about the quality of the Company's accounting principles, recommending to the Board of Directors that the Company include the audited financials in its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and overseeing compliance with the Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for disclosure of auditors' services and activities.
REVIEW OF AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Audit Committee, which
Review of Audited Financial statements
Our Board’s audit committee was established in December 2000, does not yet
have a charter.2000. The Audit Committeeaudit committee met oncetwo (2) times during fiscal 2002 (see "Committeescalendar year 2005. Mr. Greg Szabo is chairman of our audit committee as an outside director and Meetings of the Board of Directors" above).financial expert, and is currently its sole member. The Company is actively seeking
independent directors to fully reconstitute its Audit Committee. The duties of
the Audit Committee are currently being performed by the entire Board of
Directors, headed by Mr. Grollman. The Boardaudit committee has reviewed the Company'sour financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002,2005, as audited by HurleyEpstein Weber & Company, the Company'sConover, PLC, National Scientific’s independent auditors, andauditors. Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC has discussed these financial statements with management and the audit committee.
The audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management. In addition, the BoardThe audit committee has discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61. The audit committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) and has discussed with the independent accountant the independent accountant’s independence. Based on the review and these discussions, the audit process and resultscommittee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the last fiscal year for filing with Hurley & Company.
AUDIT FEESthe Commission.
Principal Accountant Fees And Services
Fees paid or accrued due, for services performed by our principal accountants, Hurley & Company,
billedduring the
Companyyears ended September 30, 2005 and
its subsidiaries approximately
$16,000 for the following professional services: audit of the annual financial
7
statements of the Company for2004 were as follows: | | | 2005 | | 2004 | |
| | | | | | |
| Audit fees - audit of annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in our 10-QSB, services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. | | $ | 23,350 | | $ | 18,700 | |
| Audit-related fees - related to the performance of audit or review of financial statements not reported under “audit fees” above | | | - | | | - | |
| Tax fees - tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning | | | - | | | - | |
| All other fees - services provided by our principal accountants other than those identified above | | | - | | | 1,500 | |
| Total fees paid or accrued to our principal accountants - Hurley & Company | | $ | 23,350 | | $ | 20,200 | |
| | | | | | | | |
No fees were paid to Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002,2005.
Fees paid to the Hurley & Company were approved by the Audit Committee.
All other Fees
Hurley & Company billed us, approximately $1,500 for other services during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 for audit services in connection with the filing of a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and reviewExchange Commission.
Fees paid to the auditors were approved by the Audit Committee.
Hurley & Company, Certified Public Accountants, based in California, were our principal auditors for the year ended September 30, 2004 and for part of fiscal year 2005. This firm is licensed to practice public accounting by the State of California, and is also registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The senior audit partner Mr. Michael Hurley is also licensed to practice public accounting in Arizona. Our shareholders in each of the interimprevious three fiscal years have ratified the use of this firm. During fiscal year 2005, Hurley & Company reviewed our unaudited financial statements includedas filed in quarterly reports on Formour form 10-QSB for the quarterly periodsquarters ended December 31, 2001,2004, March 31, 20022005 and June 30, 2002.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION FEES
2005.
The Board of Directors believes that under newly adopted regulations and guidelines arising from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, it may be required to rotate its independent auditors during fiscal year 2005. Accordingly, on November 23, 2005, the Company didengaged Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, Certified Public Accountants, of Scottsdale, Arizona, as the independent public accountants for the Company for fiscal 2005 to replace Hurley & Company. The shareholders voted to ratify such engagement at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 27, 2005. This change in no way reflects on the quality of service provided in the past by Hurley & Company.
During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and any subsequent interim period preceding the departure of Hurley & Company, there were no disagreements with Hurley & Company which were not engageresolved on any matter concerning accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Hurley & Company would have caused Hurley & Company to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports. Hurley & Company as the Company’s principal independent accountant, did not provide an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion to the Company’s financial statements, nor modify its opinion as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
We did not engage either Hurley & Company or Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, to provide services to the
Companyus regarding financial information systems design and implementation during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.
ALL OTHER FEES
None
OTHER2005. The Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of non-audit services is compatible with maintaining Hurley & Company's independence.
Company or Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC’s, independence, and has decided not to secure such services from Hurley & Company or Epstein Weber & Conover, PLC, at this time in that area.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
On April 29,
In October 2002, Mr. Lou Ross, then-Chairman of the Board, sold 240,000
shares of Common Stock in the Company. The proceeds (net of sales commissions)
of $41,125 were loaned to the Company. The loan, which bears 6% interest per
annum, is payable in twelve monthly installments of $3,649 beginning October 29,
2002. One payment of $3,000 has been made on this Note by the Company in
December 2002. The Note is thus currently in arrears.
In July 2002, Mr. Ross, sold 260,000 shares of Common Stock in the
Company. The proceeds (net of sales commissions and approximately $4,000
withheld by Mr. Ross for taxes) of approximately $34,000 were loaned to the
Company. The loan, which bears 6% interest per annum, is to be repaid in twelve
installments of $3,022 beginning February 28, 2003.
In 2000, the Company loaned its then-Chairman and CEO Mr. Ross $200,000,
using a 10% promissory note from its then-Chairman due December 1, 2000. In
December 2000 the Board authorized the extension of the loan to officer until
December 1, 2001. In February 2002, theformer Chairman of the Board, and a Director until September 30, 2003, was paid for his services as an active member of the board in shares of restricted common stock, in lieu of cash. The former Chairman received 66,806 restricted common shares at an average price on the date of grant of $0.11 per share.
In June 2003, we entered into an agreement to restructure and repay an outstanding debt to Mr. Lou Ross, a Director of National Scientific. Together with Mr. Ross, repaid
$100,000we aggregated the value of all sums we currently owed to Mr. Ross. This included notes executed of approximately $75,000, all salary deferred by Mr. Ross in 2002 of approximately $8,300, and all cash board fees deferred in 2002 by Mr. Ross of approximately $3,000, for a total amount payable to Mr. Ross as of June 11, 2003 of approximately $86,500. Mr. Ross agreed to accept one-half of this sum, or $43,250, in restricted common stock issued at the then-current market price of $0.15 cents per share, for a total share grant to Mr. Ross of 288,334 shares. Mr. Ross also agreed to convert the remaining one-half of the loantotal debt outstanding from us to him, or $43,250, into a three-year interest free note, with no payments required by returning 250,000us until the end of the three-year period, and which could be paid by us at any time before the three-year period elapses with either cash or its restricted common stock or a combination of cash and stock. With this agreement, we no longer have any outstanding delinquent notes to Mr. Ross, and our liabilities have been reduced by $43,250, though he remains a significant stockholder of ours.
Mr. Ross also agreed to take a reduction in his Director’s fees for the period from February 2003 to the end of the fiscal year ending in September 2003, and to accept 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stockour restricted common stock in lieu of cash for these board services, which was paid to him in stock on June 11, 2003. On September 30, 2003, at the point of his resignation from the Board, Mr. Ross surrendered all stock options he had received from us.
On September 30, 2002 we started a restricted Stock Retainage Program to retain key staff during a period of financial difficulty with significant periods of cash wage deferrals. We allocated approximately 3,350,000 shares with a current market price per sharevalue of $.40. In addition, the Chairman assigned his
rights$150,000 from this Stock Retainage Program pool of shares in fiscal 2002, to recover the amounts recoverablebe granted to key personnel. Grants from NetMind, an electronics company
in which the Chairman had invested. The $100,000 balance remaining after
accounting for the returnthis pool of shares were made to Michael Grollman, Graham Clark, Karen Fuhre, Oscar Quadros, and Paul Davidson. As of the stock was expenseddate of this report, none of these grants have been fully earned, and they remain subject to substantial risk of forfeiture.
In December 2004, our Chairman Michael Grollman made personal loans to the Company in the amount of $65,000 to assist us with short-term cash requirements. The loan is evidenced by an unsecured promissory note that provides for repayment within 90 days or less, at no interest. The promissory note also provides that if repayment takes longer than 90 days, then interest accrues at a rate of 6 percent per year until paid in full. We paid this Note in full in February of 2005.
On February 24, 2005, March 28, 2005, May 2, 2005, and May 27, 2005 our Chairman Michael Grollman made new personal loans to the Company.
APPROVAL AND RATIFICATIONCompany totaling $159,000 to assist us with working capital needs. The loans are evidenced by a demand note that provides for repayment within five business days of a demand notice from Mr. Grollman, with interest of 6% compounded annually from June 1, 2005. As of September 30, 2005, these loans were outstanding.
RATIFCATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
(PROPOSAL
(PROPOSAL NO. 2)
The Board of Directors has selected HurleyEpstein Weber & Company ("Hurley")Conover, PLC as the independent public accountants for the Company for fiscal 2003,2006, and recommends that the shareholders vote for ratification of such appointment. Shareholder ratification of the selection of HurleyEpstein Weber & Conover, PLC as the Company'sCompany’s independent auditors is not required by the Company'sCompany’s Bylaws or otherwise. However, the Board is submitting the selection of HurleyEpstein Weber & Conover, PLC for shareholder ratification as a matter of good corporate practice. Hurley has audited the Company's financial statements
since fiscal 1998. Notwithstanding the selection, the Board inand its Audit Committee, at its sole discretion, may direct the appointment of a new independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Board feelsthinks that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. A representative of Hurley is
expected to be present at the Annual Meeting via teleconference with the
opportunity to make a statement if he so desires and to be available to respond
to appropriate questions.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR"“FOR” THIS PROPOSAL.
8
PROPOSALS FOR NEXT2007 ANNUAL MEETING
Any shareholder who wishes to present any proposal for shareholder action at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2004,2007, must send the proposal in time for it to be received by the Company'sCompany’s Secretary, at the Company'sCompany’s offices, not later than Friday, September 26, 2003,Wednesday, November 1, 2006, in order to be included in the Company'sCompany’s proxy statement and form of proxy for that meeting. Such proposals should be addressed to the Corporate Secretary, 1445514505 North Hayden Road, Suite 202,305, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260.85260-6951. If a shareholder proposal is introduced at the 20032007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders without any discussion of the proposal in the Company'sCompany’s proxy statement, and the shareholder does not notify the Company on or before Thursday,Wednesday, November 20, 2003,1, 2006, as required by SEC Rule 14(a)-4(c)(1), of the intent to raise such proposal at the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, then proxies received by the Company for the 20032007 Annual Meeting will be voted by the persons named as such proxies in their discretion with respect to such proposals. Notice of such proposal is to be sent to the above address.
By Order of the Board of Directors
/s/ Graham L. Clark, Secretary
Graham L. Clark, Secretary
Dated January 27, 2003
| | | By Order of the Board of Directors /s/ Graham L. Clark, Secretary Graham L. Clark, Secretary |
| Dated: March 10, 2006 | | | |
REQUESTS FOR FORM 10-KSB
UPON WRITTEN REQUEST, NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION WILL FURNISH, WITHOUT CHARGE TO PERSONS SOLICITED BY THIS PROXY STATEMENT, A COPY OF OUR REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002.2005. REQUESTS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, 1445514505 NORTH HAYDEN ROAD, SUITE 202,305, SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85260,85260-6951, ATTENTION: KAREN FUHRE.
9